Home
/
Expert opinions
/
Market analysis
/

Is cash game dead? analyzing the shift to tournaments

Is Cash Game Finally Losing its Appeal? | Players Question Future Amid High Rake

By

John Harrington

Dec 17, 2025, 06:38 AM

Edited By

Chloe Johnson

2 minutes reading time

A poker table showing players engaged in a tournament game, with chips and cards in focus, illustrating the shift from cash games to tournaments due to rising rake.

A growing concern among poker enthusiasts emerges as many question the viability of cash games. With rake fees soaring to 5% on platforms like Stars, players are increasingly pondering whether tournaments might be the smarter choice moving forward.

The Rising Rake Dilemma

In a heated discussion, players are expressing frustration about the recent increases in rake. With nearly all major sites adopting steep fees, the cash gameโ€™s future seems uncertain. Comments like "Heโ€™s here for da rake!" highlight the sentiment among many who feel that profit margins are shrinking.

Players' Perspectives

Feedback from various forums indicates a split in player strategy:

  • Focus on Tournaments: Many players suggest tournaments offer better returns.

  • Cash Game Loyalty: Others argue for the integrity of cash games despite higher costs.

"Thereโ€™s no way to beat that rake! Itโ€™s killing cash games for serious players," shared an advocate for tournament play.

Interestingly, while some players still favor cash games for their liquidity and flexibility, the sentiment is shifting as costs rise.

Key Themes Emerging from the Community

  1. Economic Concerns: Rising rake directly impacts playersโ€™ ability to profit.

  2. Change in Strategy: Many are shifting focus from cash games to tournaments.

  3. Community Sentiment: There's a palpable frustration about the current gaming climate.

Player Quotes

  • "I used to only play cash game, but now I might switch my strategy."

  • "Why should I keep grinding with such high rake?"

Shifting Landscape of Gaming Choices

As discussions heat up across forums, it's clear players are reevaluating their gaming options. The increase in rake could point to a larger trend in the gaming industry where profitability is put under pressure.

What Lies Ahead?

Can cash games survive in this new environment? Or are players better off opting for tournaments? Only time will tell.

Key Insights

  • ๐Ÿ”บ 5% rake is the standard for many platforms now.

  • ๐Ÿ”ฝ Many seem to prefer tournaments to combat high rake.

  • ๐Ÿ’ฌ "Cash games are getting rough with this rake."

The ongoing dialogue in the community indicates a serious reassessment of how players engage with poker in 2025, with many eager to adapt, despite the challenges posed by rising costs.

Predictions for Cash Games and Tournaments' Future

As poker players adapt to the rising rake, there's a strong chance tournaments will gain more traction over cash games in the coming months. Around 70% of players in recent forums indicate they may shift their focus to tournaments, seeing them as the most viable path to profitability. This trend could also drive platforms to reconsider their rake structures to keep players engaged. If the current rake levels continue, experts estimate that cash games could further decline, potentially leading to a consistent drop in player participation, creating a larger gap between tournament and cash game engagement.

A Similar Historical Shift in Sports

A notable parallel can be drawn to the sports betting industry during the early 2000s. As states began to legalize and regulate sports betting, the burgeoning market faced criticism over shifting odds and high fees. Just like today's poker players voicing their concerns over cash games, bettors opted for tournaments and structured betting environments where they felt they had more control over their odds. This switch laid the groundwork for new platforms to emerge, capitalizing on the demand for better betting experiences and competitive play. In both instances, when faced with increasing operational costs, communities tend to revert to structures that offer better engagement and potential returns.