Double Board PLO Bomb Pots | Players Clash Over Rake and Game Flow
A heated debate on double board pot-limit Omaha (PLO) bomb pots is brewing among local poker enthusiasts. Many argue these pots, increasingly popular at home games, are more trouble than they're worth due to higher rake and slower gameplay.
The Rake Impact
Concerns surrounding the rake persist. Some players assert the fees on bomb pots can reach double that of standard games. One person stated, "I think you are overestimating the impact of rake in most rooms, but the less hands per hour issue is a bigger deal for profitable players."
Slower Games and Fewer Hands
The time it takes to play a bomb pot draws criticism. "You can usually get two hands in during the time a bomb pot takes," a player remarked, emphasizing the lost opportunities for the game they love. Reports indicate that hands can take up to three times longer than standard no-limit hold'em (NLH) hands.
Profitability and Skill Concerns
While some players enjoy the thrill of bomb pots, others highlight a skill divide. Comments reveal that many still play poorly; one local player said, "My local room even has a double-board only table, and it's still very soft." This gap can lead to a profitable situation for those mastering the nuances but frustrating for others.
"The edge is huge," noted a player who feels the competitive atmosphere remains favorable for those willing to adapt.
Conversely, players worried about the game's sustainability at lower stakes pointed out, "For lower stakes, it kills the game faster." A call for balance between maintaining interest and ensuring profitability is apparent.
The Debate Continues
The clash of perspectives on double board PLO bomb pots underscores a rift in player sentiment. While many players believe these pots heighten excitement and profitability, others feel the overall experience diminishes as rake and slow play become dominant issues.
Key Insights
🚩 High rake: Fees can be double that of standard games.
⏰ Extended hands lead to lost gameplay opportunities.
💰 Haves and have nots emerge in skills, with some thriving while others struggle.
As discussions continue, players are left wondering if adjustments to double board PLO bomb pots can satisfy the audience or if a return to more traditional forms of poker is necessary. How will local game organizers respond to these concerns?