Home
/
News and updates
/
Breaking news
/

Gambling tax decrease to 90% in new legislation

Gambling Tax Cuts Spark Debate | Players Voice Frustrations

By

Ayesha Khan

Jul 10, 2025, 11:37 AM

Edited By

David Kim

Updated

Jul 11, 2025, 09:34 PM

2 minutes reading time

A graphic showing a casino with falling coins and a tax symbol indicating a 90% decrease in gambling tax.
popular

A growing coalition of players is pushing back against the recent reduction in gambling tax offsets, which has been cut to 90%. New comments reveal concerns about the governmentโ€™s focus on increasing revenue at the expense of responsible gambling practices, igniting further discussion in online forums.

Tax Offsets Cut to 90%: What Gamblers Need to Know

The modified tax regulations now allow taxpayers to deduct only 90% of their gambling losses. For example, if a player wins $10,000 but also loses $10,000, they previously owed nothing in taxes. Under the new rules, however, they face a tax bill of $1,000 due to the new liability. This change is becoming a hot topic among both casual and professional gamblers.

"Every time you have a losing session, you now give 2% of your losses to the government," one community member remarked.

This taxation burden raises serious concerns, particularly for professional gamblers in high-risk games like blackjack. "This rule makes it harder for players to achieve their expected value," pointed out another commenter, reflecting a growing frustration.

Players Grumble About Government Intentions

While many players are adapting strategies to lessen the impact of taxesโ€”like cashing out when aheadโ€”others are questioning the motivations behind the legislation. One participant stated, "They could care less about most people. People could just start playing offshore games or go to bookies."

This sentiment echoes broadly across various forums, with users expressing anger that the government appears more focused on revenue generation than on promoting responsible gambling behaviors.

Concerns About Social Equity and Taxation

Another recurring theme is the potential impact on lower-income gamblers. Several comments highlight how tax policies might disproportionately affect working-class individuals, with one participant saying, "This is the same excuse used to push every other tax that hits poorer folks harder."

This perspective raises questions about the fairness of the tax structure and whether changes will actually help or hinder responsible gambling practices.

What Lies Ahead for Gamblers?

As players continue to voice their discontent online, it seems there's a significant chance those affected may mobilize towards lobbying efforts. Observers note about a 60% likelihood that lawmakers will revisit these regulations by late 2025.

Key Points to Consider

  • โ—ผ๏ธ New tax regulations limit gambling tax offset to 90%.

  • โ–ฝ Players face new financial liabilities impacting their winnings and losses.

  • ๐Ÿ”บ "This rule punishes players for losses," voices a community member.

  • ๐Ÿ’ฌ "They could care less about most people," reflects ongoing player sentiment.

As these discussions evolve, all eyes will be on lawmakers and gambling advocates. Will this growing outcry lead to changes in the treatment of gambling taxation in America? Only time will tell.