A recent incident at the Plaza and El Cortez has ignited intense discussions among players about mid-game betting at craps tables. On April 30, 2025, a player bought in during an ongoing game, facing criticism and questioning etiquette in the gambling community.
The player drew backlash for joining the game after it had already started, with some calling it a complete breach of conduct. This act was not only condemned by many but also led to comments like, "You bought in mid-roll and then bet the donโt pass and celebrated on the 7? Thatโs like the trifecta of douchebag." Critics say that doing all three actions demonstrates a lack of respect for the game.
Comments reveal multiple perspectives on this event:
Questioning Game Mechanics
Some players sought to get clarity on game rules, discussing the buy-in specifics. One player asked, "What do you mean you got out on a point of 8?" This indicates a deeper inquiry into the complexities of gameplay.
Strategic Criticism
Further debate emerged regarding strategy. Another comment questioned, "How can you put 480 behind when the DP was 40?" This highlights the expectation of strategic understanding among gamblers.
Nostalgia for Local Casinos
Players expressed strong ties to the venues being discussed. One noted, "Ah, the good old El Cortez. My favorite hotel in Vegas." The strong emotional connection to these locations reflects local pride mixed into the gambling etiquette discussion.
The sentiment in the comments trends negative, focusing mainly on perceived violations of etiquette and strategic shortcomings. Divisions appear within the community on whether the playerโs actions stemmed from ignorance or a willful disregard for the game.
โ ๏ธ Etiquette Violated: Plenty claim that mid-roll buy-ins spoil the integrity of the game.
๐ฒ Strategic Concerns: Ongoing disputes about understanding game rules show deeper issues of knowledge in gambling.
๐ Local Casino Affection: Strong attachments to venues add a personal level to this debate.
As Las Vegas remains a focal point for tradition and evolution in gambling culture, incidents like this compel players to reflect on acceptable behaviors. Will attitudes toward buying in during a game shift, or will such controversies continue to be part of the charm?