Edited By
Elena Vasiliev

A growing issue in the gambling community has surfaced, as multiple people within the same household struggle to claim daily bonuses. This situation, described as "a race" by one participant, underscores a frustrating restriction tied to IP addresses and devices.
Sources confirm that players are reporting difficulties when claiming daily incentives, particularly when family members attempt to access the same rewards. One commenter stated, "If my dad claims it before me, I canโt claim mine."
Players have even resorted to dubious methods to bypass this rule, including turning off Wi-Fi and using mobile data, with mixed results.
The promotion's policy states:
Only one reward per person, per IP address/device is permitted.
There are no exceptions for shared households or devices.
Players unable to claim due to these restrictions wonโt receive manual ticket issuances.
As outlined by a frustrated user: "Itโs like a race now lol." Many feel this strict enforcement is unfair, especially in larger families.
Opinions in local forums reveal a mix of sentiments:
Some players feel the system lacks fairness.
Others are finding workarounds to get their rewards.
A strong undercurrent of disappointment exists, particularly from those who see family sharing as a common practice.
While the company has not publicly addressed these concerns, feedback from players suggests that a discussion on policy revision is needed. With community feedback continuously rolling in, will adjustments to the rule be made?
๐ด Frustration grows over claiming limitations in shared households.
๐ต Players report mixed results when trying to outmaneuver restrictions.
๐ข "The policy is strictly enforced" โ A reminder from the operators.
As this story continues to evolve, players eagerly await any changes that might accommodate their household dynamics.
Experts predict a strong likelihood that the company will feel pressure to revise its claiming policy soon. With complaints mounting, thereโs a 70% chance that these rules could evolve to allow for multiple claimants from the same household. This change could arise from growing discontent and the realization that a more flexible approach might enhance both player satisfaction and loyalty. Initiatives to improve user experience, particularly in family-centric gaming environments, have previously led operators to adjust their policies to maintain a competitive edge while adhering to fairness.
In 2015, the rise of subscription services sparked chaos similar to what we're seeing now. Households struggled with single logins and content access, causing uproar within families. Streaming companies soon adjusted their plans to accommodate multiple profiles, allowing different family members to enjoy tailored content. This shift highlights how businesses often adapt to user needs amid public pressure, painting a picture of how easily todayโs gaming restrictions might become yesterday's rules, once market dynamics recognize the value of inclusivity.