Home
/
Expert opinions
/
Financial insights
/

Understanding the impact of 90 percent losses on taxation

Big Tax Changes | 90% Gambling Losses Rule Raises Concerns

By

John Smith

Oct 31, 2025, 07:26 PM

3 minutes reading time

A person reviewing gaming losses and tax implications with a calculator and papers on a table

In a recent discussion among gambling enthusiasts, concerns have emerged about new tax regulations affecting how winnings and losses are reported. Some people are raising alarms over the financial impact these changes may hold for casual and professional gamblers alike.

Breaking Down the Tax Rules

Under the new IRS rules, players can now only deduct 90% of gambling losses against their winnings. This means that if someone puts in $100,000 in buy-ins but only wins back the same amount, they will still owe tax on the remaining losses. A common scenario shared by players illustrates this:

  • Example: Total Buy-ins: $100,000

Total Winnings: $100,000

Losses Deductible: $90,000

Taxable Income: $10,000

One player emphasized, "If you made $100,000 and lost $90,000, youโ€™re left with $10,000 taxable profit, even if you technically broke even."

Navigating the New Landscape

Such shifts in tax policy are expected to significantly affect high earners. For example, those who make $250,000 or more will face a tax rate of about 35% on the taxable income stated above. "Gamblers need to be ready for this," noted one commenter, hinting that many may seek ways to adapt their tax filings.

Interestingly, some players have speculated on the potential for illicit strategies emerging in response to these rules. Increased underground play could lead to loss of tax revenue for the government, which initially geared up to collect around $110 million yearly from these changes.

"Either the IRS wins $110 million or the players adapt, and they see nothing," one participant remarked, highlighting uncertainty in the gambling community.

Insights from the People

The sentiment across forums is mixed:

  • Adaptive Strategies: Some players may look to alternative measures, like finding backers to lower their tax liability.

  • Wary Sentiment: Others express concerns about proving losses, with one saying, "You need proof for the $90,000 loss to offset it properly."

  • Winners Face Challenges: Players like one who scored $90,000 in a tournament and then lost the same amount lamented the confusion in tax reporting.

Key Insights

  • โœฆ "If you break even, youโ€™re still taxed on profits," warns a top commenter.

  • โœฆ Estimates suggest potential government savings of up to $110 million annually, but may fall short if players adapt.

  • โœฆ Reports indicate that players are looking for ways to navigate these tax challenges, raising the possibility of an underground poker scene.

As the dust settles on these new regulations, one question remains: will these changes benefit the IRS, or will the gambling community find ways to bypass these financial pitfalls?

What's Next for Gamblers?

There is a strong chance that many gamblers will explore various options to mitigate their tax burdens in response to the new regulations. Experts estimate around 60% may turn to alternative strategies, such as pooling resources with other players or seeking partnerships to share winnings. As underground games become more appealing, it's possible we could see an uptick in cash-only betting environments that sidestep these reporting requirements altogether. This could inadvertently drive a wedge in the IRS's projected revenue of $110 million, as many players look for less visible ways to manage their finances.

Echoes of the Black Market

Drawing a parallel to the Prohibition era, when alcohol was outlawed and underground speakeasies thrived, the recent gambling tax changes may push some players to operate outside legal boundaries. Just as the government struggled to enforce alcohol bans and lost significant tax revenue, today's IRS might face similar challenges as gamblers seek covert avenues. The rise in these secretive environments could eventually lead to a new form of betting culture, much like the hidden bars of the 1920s created a unique social fabric. Just as then, regulation and enforcement will need to adapt to a rapidly changing landscape.