Edited By
Sophie Yamamoto
A player in Louisiana has raised serious allegations against a local casino for what he claims is an illegal exclusion from the blackjack table. The issue revolves around the interpretation of the state law, which protects individuals from being barred based solely on skill level.
Under La. ยง27:27.2(A)(3)(b), individuals cannot be excluded from a gaming establishment based solely on their skill level. Despite this, the casino asserted they were not barring the player from the entire establishment, only from blackjack.
โThis sets a dangerous precedent,โ commented one forum participant. โIf skill-based exclusions were accepted, it could lead to broader discrimination.โ
Interpretation of the Law: Commenters argue that a game-specific ban violates the intent of the law.
Precedent Concerns: Concerns were raised about potential implications if casinos can exclude skilled players without consequences.
Need for Legal Action: Participants urged the player to seek legal advice for potential recourse against the casino.
"It seems pretty cut and dry. Youโre right, but youโll need the right advocate to make that case in court," noted a user.
The sentiment in user boards is divided:
Support for the Playerโs Argument: Many believe the casinoโs actions are clearly against the law.
Skeptical Viewpoints: Others are less convinced, arguing that the casino might find loopholes to justify their exclusion policy.
Call for Accountability: A significant number of comments emphasize the need for casinos to adhere strictly to state gaming laws.
๐ซ The law protects against exclusions based on skill, as confirmed by multiple comments.
๐ "If it was illegal, theyโd just flat bet you," remarked one commentator, emphasizing the potential risk for the casino.
๐ Legal experts might need to clarify this ambiguous interpretation of casino policies.
As this developing story unfolds, will legal action be taken against the casino to uphold the rights of skilled gamblers? Only time will tell. For now, the implications of this case could affect how casinos enforce rules against skilled players in the future.