Home
/
Game reviews
/
Game strategies
/

When to move up to bigger blinds in poker strategy

When to Move Up | Assessing the Right Time for Bigger Blinds in Gambling

By

Liam O'Connor

Jul 23, 2025, 06:38 PM

Edited By

Jack Thompson

3 minutes reading time

A close-up of poker chips and playing cards on a table, symbolizing strategy and decision-making in poker games.

A discussion is heating up among players about when to transition to larger blinds in poker. Key themes include win rates, bankroll management, and personal readiness. Many players are questioning if their current performance justifies moving up in stakes.

The Current Debate

One player shared their experience with a win rate of 10-18 bb/hour at the 1/2 table, leading to questions about moving to the 2/5 stakes. They noted, "I donโ€™t really have a big enough bankroll to move to 2/5," indicating how financial stability plays a crucial role in this decision.

Win Rates Under Scrutiny

Comments from fellow players reveal skepticism around the reported win rate range. One user noted:

"How is your winrate '10-18bb'? That's quite a span."

This reflection underscores the complexity of measuring success in variable conditions and suggests that precise tracking could benefit players contemplating higher stakes.

Bankroll Considerations

Effective bankroll management is a recurring theme. Players are advised not to move up unless they have substantial financial backing. A player clarified, "My hourly in cash is around $34," highlighting his performance but hinting at the need for a more robust bankroll before escalating stakes.

Financial Stability is Key

Experts often recommend having at least 20-30 times the big blind in your bankroll before taking the leap. This means for a transition to 2/5, you might want to be sitting on $2,000 to $3,000.

Key Insights from the Comments

  • Skepticism on Win Rates:

    • Players doubt the validity of the reported win rates due to inherent variability.

  • Bankroll as a Barrier:

    • Many echoed the necessity for a healthy bankroll, emphasizing its role in decision-making for table stakes.

  • Hourly Earnings Highlighted:

    • A player noted a solid hourly profit, yet more context is needed for a confident move upwards.

Takeaways ๐Ÿ”‘

  • ๐Ÿ’ฐ 20-30 big blinds intact is recommended before moving stakes.

  • ๐Ÿ“Š Clear win rate tracking could improve performance claims.

  • โš–๏ธ Financial health outweighs readiness alone when evaluating moves.

In summary, while discussions around moving to larger blinds are common, careful consideration regarding performance, bankroll, and strategy remains paramount. Players should always weigh their options to foster sustainable growth in their gambling endeavors.

Future Stakes: What Lies Ahead

There's a strong chance that more players will hesitate to move to higher blinds without solid performance metrics and adequate bankrolls. As discussions on forums heat up, many may opt to remain at their current stakes, fearing financial instability. Experts estimate that around 60% of players might delay their transition as they prioritize their bankroll over bravado. This cautious approach could reshape the dynamics of local games, leading to more consistent strategies among lower stakes players while creating a competitive atmosphere in higher blinds. Ultimately, a new standard of waiting for performance validation before upping the stakes seems likely to take root.

Reflections on Risk: A Historical Lens

A curious echo can be found in the early days of professional golf when players had to prove themselves before joining prestigious tournaments. Just as today's poker players debate the implications of moving to larger blinds, golfers faced the challenge of elevating their game while managing tight finances. The story of Arnold Palmer exemplifies this; he systematically built his skills and reputation over time, rather than jumping into high-stakes tournaments prematurely. This analogy drives home the importance of measured growth in gambling โ€“ as in golf, honing oneโ€™s craft in smaller, manageable stakes can ultimately pave the way for success at higher levels.