Home
/
Expert opinions
/
Financial insights
/

Sick downswing graph: donโ€™t rely on poker variance

Shocking Downswings in Poker | Donโ€™t Rely Solely on Variance

By

Emily Johnson

Nov 27, 2025, 07:04 AM

Edited By

Emily Chang

Updated

Nov 27, 2025, 06:45 PM

2 minutes reading time

A graph showing a steep decline in a player's poker performance, indicating a 70 buy-ins loss over time.

A recent online poker analysis has reignited discussions about the severe volatility in professional gambling. A player is down 70 buy-ins under expected value (EV) across about 250,000 hands, raising concerns and sparking debates on the risks of depending solely on poker as a source of income.

Whatโ€™s the Buzz?

This data follows a poignant graph shared in user boards, illustrating the steep downswings professional players often face. One forum participant noted, "The question is not 'if', the question is 'when' the results will meet the green line again," reflecting a widespread belief in the eventual recovery through sheer volume. However, skepticism remains high, with many warning against the misconceived belief that variance guarantees future winnings.

"The deck doesnโ€™t remember youโ€™ve been tortured. Variance doesnโ€™t keep a ledger. Poker doesnโ€™t owe you anything."

Variance: A Double-Edged Sword

Users voiced their thoughts on managing expectations as they navigate poker's unpredictable nature. One participant commented, "Any good player will tell you that if you put enough volume in, youโ€™ll win over the long haul if youโ€™re a winning player." However, another noted the possibility of prolonged downswings, stating, "Not even 100 buy-ins; youโ€™ll probably see worse if you keep playing."

  • Personal experiences shared indicate that downswings are commonplace, particularly in Pot-Limit Omaha (PLO).

  • Another highlight was the emphasis on embracing variance: "Some believe volume will close the gap, but thatโ€™s a dressed-up version of the gamblerโ€™s fallacy."

Learning from Mistakes

Interestingly, the player in focus previously ran 50 buy-ins above EV over one million hands but now faces a streak of losses since switching to PLO. This shift has led him to reconsider his career, currently playing semi-pro and diversifying into e-commerce.

The emotional toll of such downswings raises the question of measuring impacts on professional viability. Participants suggest building a diverse career path might provide stability against the unpredictable nature of poker.

Key Insights

  • ๐ŸŽฒ 70 buy-ins below EV raises urgent concerns for regular players.

  • ๐Ÿ”„ Recovery not guaranteed? Voices caution against a purely volume-driven expectation.

  • ๐Ÿ’ก "The mathematically correct expectation is that the lines stay as they are now."

Whatโ€™s Next for Aspiring Pros?

Continuing discussions on poker variance indicate a trend where players may reconsider solely relying on the game for income. Experts estimate that around 60% of full-time players might explore alternative income sources in the coming year. Those who expand their skill sets or revenue streams could discover more stability and less emotional strain.

Lessons from Other Fields

The path of poker players mirrors the journeys of professional athletes who faced career-ending injuries yet found success in new fields. Much like these athletes, pros dealing with severe downswings might find opportunities to pivot into new ventures, showcasing that setbacks can lead to redefined success.

For ongoing discussions about poker variance and community strategies, check out active user boards focusing on gambling insights.